Rode's VideoMic Go II changed my opinion on what a shotgun mic can do xopixestin en

 It's likewise viable with Rode's work area podcasting programming.

At whatever point somebody inquires "what's the best amplifier" the reaction is typically "well it depends what you're recording." Rode's new VideoMic Go II, as the name recommends, wouldn't be appropriate for podcasting. Would it?

Obviously, the VideoMic Go II was intended to sit on a camera. That's simply true, however with USB and 3.5mm results and similarity with Rode Connect – the organization's USB-accommodating podcasting application – it turns out this lightweight, $99 mic could be more adaptable than it initially appears.

Assuming you are searching for a mic for your DSLR, realize that the VideoMic Go II has a virus shoe mount, the previously mentioned 3.5mm out (which can likewise be utilized for observing) and it comes packaged with a Rycote shock mount and a windscreen in the container. There's no auxiliary/security/sound system recording here or on-mic gain control, however that is typical for something in this value range.

Execution insightful, the sound is shockingly rich for a mic of this size without sounding as well "dead." There's no outstanding contrast between the sound you escape the USB port contrasted with the 3.5mm port bar a little variety in gain. When contrasting it against Rode's VideoMic Me and VideoMic NTG, the VideoMic Go II likely could be my top choice of the bundle. It's normal, centered with a perfect proportion of atmosphere/feeling of room.

Where the VideoMic Go II gets more fascinating is the way it acts in other use cases. When connected to a PC and put on a work area the VideoMic Go II sounds similarly as powerful as undeniably more costly unique mouthpieces. To such an extent it tossed me briefly.

Maybe the best outline of this is the point at which I tried it against the $400 Shure SM7B and Rode's own $99 NT USB Mini. Considering that both of the Rodes in this test are condenser receivers and cost with regards to something very similar, you may figure those two would be the closer match, however incidentally, the VideoMic Go II sounded a lot nearer to the SM7B. This isn't to say it's comparable to the SM7B (there's somewhat more profundity in the Shure and a touch more unique reach maybe) yet given the difference in value, it most certainly wasn't normal.

This similitude is additionally intensified when you think about that the diverse sort of container – Rode's condenser versus Shure's dynamic – alone would commonly give them a totally different sound. You can hear every one of the three amplifiers in the example underneath. It begins with the Shure, then, at that point, the VideoMic Go II and afterward the NT Mini. The progress between the initial two is unobtrusive, yet the last one is self-evident. Gracious, and the VideoMic Go II was around two inches further away from my mouth than the SM7B was.

Obviously, this is only one test, in one situation in one explicit room. In any case, for a speedy examination of what a $400 mic can do spur of the moment contrasted with a $99 one, it's a decent beginning stage. Regardless of the absence of on-gadget controls, there are a few configurable choices by means of Rode Central. When associated with the application (portable or work area) you'll have the choice to change the addition level, apply a high pass channel/high-recurrence support and change the checking volume. It's less helpful than physical on-mic controls, yet at the same time permits you some command over the way that it sounds or reacts to various sources of info. (In the event that you're pondering, the sound above begins with the SM7B and changes to the VideoMic Go II at "two condenser receivers").

Considering that Rode added similarity for Connect, and the USB choice makes it telephone and tablet-accommodating, out of nowhere the VideoMic Go II could in all likelihood be a decent all-rounder at the cost. A mic that has video cleaves however can likewise perform twofold responsibility as a digital recording mic (and, hence a generally useful PC mic) there gives off an impression of being a ton of value for the authentic money.

Obviously, assuming you truly need something that records a wellbeing channel, has actual variable addition controls or then again assuming XLR network is an absolute necessity, this isn't the one to go for. In any case, for most broad maker employments? It at long last may not totally "rely upon what you're recording."